I put mine at 160 for quite some time(8 months) and everything has been fine.
On 8/25/05, RBW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not to worry... > DD-WRT caught my eye because it was Sveasoft Talisman and the purpose of > them doing this variation sounded just like the thinking of a good > sysadmin. The other stuff was just a red flag but like you say not > critical to function. > > I am quite pleased with how things are working so far. I am trying to > find info on a safe level to turn up the wireless radio. EWRTv0.2 (on my > old WRT54Gv2 HW) recommends no more than @60-65 on a scale that tops out > at 84mW for any length of time but I notice the Sveasoft variations > start at the Linksys default of 28mW and scale to 251mW. That is a big > difference given 84mW supposedly can fry the wireless radio if set that > high over time. > > If you hear of any fry level details lemme know... Thanks. > > RBW > > > Tom Gal wrote: > > >I won't lie. I get the version from the site, and it's always worked > >perfectly (except in cases where there was documentation otherwise). > >Personally I like to evaluate things on functionality, ease of use, > >and of course cost, rather than what license it runs under or who > >wrote it. This software works great for $20. That's enough for me. > > > >T > > > >On 8/25/05, RBW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>RBW wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Tom Gal wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>The sveasoft firmware is the best thing to hit linksys routers I've > >>>>found. All the functionality, gives you security, ssh/shell access to > >>>>the device, and let's you jack the power way up along with just about > >>>>everything else you can imagine. I install it for someone almost every > >>>>week, and I've been running it on various linksys routers in my purvey > >>>>for some time now. > >>>> > >>>>-T. > >>>> > >>>>On 8/23/05, RBW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Has anyone put "alchemy" from Sveasoft on their WRT54G? How is that > >>>>>working? > >>>>>Has anyone put "Alchemy" from this alternative onto their WRT54G? > >>>>>http://wrt54g.thermoman.de/ > >>>>> > >>>>>I was using EWRTv0.2 for some endusers (I'm saving the fun of OpenWRT > >>>>>for myself and my next WRT54G/GS for later) but the EWRTv0.3beta lacks > >>>>>non-CLI WDS and "client" mode (which was in v0.2) for the wireless > >>>>>radio. It appears that this Freeman Basic/The "Individual" method may > >>>>>work fine in setting up a WDS config and/or a "client" wireless bridge > >>>>>that will also accept connections as a WAP while bridging... > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm looking around the different options and how a 3rd party firmware > >>>>>with a GUI interface like the original Linksys might work for someone > >>>>>who will eventually need to be told to do this or that in a non-CLI > >>>>>manner. > >>>>> > >>>>>TIA for any tips, > >>>>>RBW > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>[email protected] > >>>>>http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Is that the pay (the bastards) $20 method or the do you use one of the > >>>offerings from this "Individual" person and could you post back the > >>>file name of a recent firmware you've had success with? > >>> > >>>Sorry to mention the GPL warfare but it does cloud the process of > >>>making a proper useful decision. > >>> > >>>RBW > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>This 3rd party firmware worked... > >>http://wrt-wiki.bsr-clan.de/index.php?title=DD-WRT_Docu_%28EN%29#What_is_Needed.3F > >>Following this procedure (with appropriate modifications for the > >>particular circumstances)... > >>http://www.linksysinfo.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=7 > >> > >>So I have an older WRT54Gv2 hardware running an older different 3rd > >>party firmware (WDS capable) connected via cat5 on the WAN side to the > >>DSL modem and I have a WRT54Gv3 hardware running DD-WRT and connecting > >>to the first unit on the LAN side wirelessly while also accepting > >>connections from the wireless card on the laptop. > >> > >>This is good because previously I had a very old wireless AP/switch > >>connected via cat5 to a wireless bridge connecting to the first WRT54Gv2 > >>unit to reach all parts of the lot. Now the bridge is not necessary with > >>WDS working. > >> > >>RBW > >> > >> > >>-- > >>[email protected] > >>http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
