On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:50:40PM -0700, DJA wrote:
> Lan Barnes wrote:
> >Over the weekend I installed a 6 G Quantum IDE HD as added space on my
> >SCSI server. I had no problem. I then moved about 2 G of digital photos
> >to it and deleted them from the original space. A mistake.
> 
> Was this a known good hard drive?
> 

Good on last machine is all I can attest to.

> 
> 
> >Several of these steps are now obvious mistakes.
> 
> As in the difference in safety between cp+rm vs. mv? ;-)
> 

Hmm ... that part worked OK. It was the cp across NFS on the wireless
that got me.

> 
> >The server now refuses to come up with this HD on line. It gives a
> >message that there is a I/O buffer failure on /dev/hdd (the "new" drive)
> >while loading init, and refuses to boot past that, even when the drive
> >is removed from /etc/fstab and the BIOS. I have to take power off the
> >drive to boot up. Then everything is OK, except my photos are gone.
> 
> Are you sure the server's power supply is up to the added loaded of an 
> additional HD?
> 

No, I'm not. And I actually thought about it. But it wasn't meaningful
thought, because I'm pretty ignorant in those areas. But I did have to
add a pigtail splitter (first one on this box). And the drive worked on
the box for a couple of days before the sad event.

- 2 scsi HDs
- 1 CD ROM
- 1 CD/DVD R/W
- 1 floppy
- and the new IDE HD

> 
> >So what is recommended? I plan to try (in this order)
> >Remarks or advice?
> 
> I suggest that you download and run the drive mfgr's diagnostic software 
>   before you go mucking with the drive yourself. Generally that 
> software boots from floppy or CD so you can disconnect power from any 
> other drives first, in case it really is a PS problem.
> 

Good idea! I'll do it!

> 
> As I always recommend: do *not* jump to the conclusion that your HD is 
> bad just because data is being corrupted or even if it doesn't work. 
> It's not running in a vacuum. It depends on several other critical 
> components in your system to do its job reliably.
> 

Your recommendations are one of the reasons I post here.

> Another lesson that might or not be relevant here: don't put critical 
> data on a questionable and untested lump of hardware.
> 

Well, that and archive valuable data before screwing around with it.

-- 
Lan Barnes                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist     858-354-0616


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to