Ralph Shumaker wrote:
This email, as I received it, had the subject line:
"{SPAM?} Re: ipod problems"
Where did "{SPAM?} " come from? This is not the first time. I'm
assuming that Gus did not put it there. Could it be that my ISP is
automaticly filtering out known spam without telling me about such
practice and just tagging the unknowns? Could this be why I get
virtually *zero* spam? (I avoid giving out my email address. I
usually bail on any web form that has an asterik requiring it, usually
even when I really wanted whatever it was on the other side.)
Nevertheless, I cannot believe that my lack of spam is due completely
to my vigilence.
I just found the answer to one of my questions. I found it in the
header (once I thought to look):
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Sep 24 11:58:30 2005
X-UIDL: 1127573100mwurg4g12t
X-Mozilla-Status: 0003
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 08: 45:00 2005
Received: from mail-02.cwnet.com ([66.77.162.11]
helo=shield-01.cwnet.com) by localsmtp-01.cwnet.com with esmtp (Exim
4.52) id 1EJBGu-00032E-7Q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005
08:45:00 -0600
Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org ([206.251.247.139]) by
shield-01.cwnet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EJCC0-0004YT-7V for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:44:01 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771B42A5EC; Sat, 24
Sep 2005 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(sparkplug.kernel-panic.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with
ESMTP id 12972-06; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1]) by sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
169AC2A5D1; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACAA2A5A2 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(sparkplug.kernel-panic.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with
ESMTP id 12972-05 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005
08:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ltsp1.ltsp.com (ltsp1.ltsp.com [69.43.136.84]) by
sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236B22A132 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gus (o1-dialup-66-81-180-115.rev.o1.com [66.81.180.115])
by ltsp1.ltsp.com (8.12.8-20030924/8.12.8) with SMTP id j8OFisg1004634
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:43:38 -0700
To: Main Discussion List for KPLUG <[email protected]>
From: Gus Wirth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Main Discussion List for KPLUG <[email protected]>
List-Id: Main Discussion List for KPLUG <kplug-list.kernel-panic.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-list>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Score: 11.0 (+++++++++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the CWNet anti-spam
system, has scanned this mail for spam and viruses. If this scored high
enough, it will be rejected, or the subject will be marked. If you have
any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. In
these headers are spam scores the mail system found for this message.
Content analysis details: (11.0 points, 7.0 required) pts rule name
description --- ----------------------
-------------------------------------------- 0.3 FCS_URI_NODOTS URI: URI
found with no Dots (.) -6.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is
0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 17 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Scan-Signature: eed75ce51e52bfd60584d764897b2fc3
Subject: {SPAM?} Re: ipod problems
X-UIDL: 1127573100mwurg4g12t
At 15:43 09/23/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 0
Buffer I/O error on device sda, logical block 0
Buffer I/O error on device sda, logical block 1
end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 80325
FAT: unable to read boot sector
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fdisk /dev/sdb
Unable to open /dev/sdb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Looks like there are problems with the iPod itself. Why are you trying to
read device sdb (the second SCSI device) instead of the iPod (sda, the
first emulated SCSI device)?
Gus
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
