It is against the law for Joe to take and sell a recognizable
photograph of someone without their permission.
Ummm..no. It's not.
what is your source?
The National Enquirer.
-ajb
(And the Star, and Us Weekly, and The Globe...)
You're referring to pictures of public figures ?
The courts have rules that public figures can't pick and choose which
"image" they want to portray.
Private peeople though, can, and a photographer must get a persons
release to use their image for commerical purposes. I assume this is why
there are so many faces "blurred out" in Cops....
--
Michael O'Keefe | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Live on and Ride a 03 BMW F650GSDakar| [EMAIL PROTECTED] / |
I like less more or less less than |Work:+1 858 845 3514 / |
more. UNIX-live it,love it,fork() it |Fax :+1 858 845 2652 /_p_|
My views are MINE ALONE, blah, blah, |Home:+1 760 788 1296 \`O'|
blah, yackety yack - don't come back |Fax :+1 858 _/_\|_,
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
