The only thing I could see would be that they're going to incur costs in uninstalling M$ and installing Openoffice, and costs for changing the document format for M$ documents that don't just "straight-convert".
Either way, it sounds like typical government crap saying that they don't like it, but they won't give any reason. Levi On 10/27/05, Christian Seberino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now I've heard everything. This one really makes me mad. How > a bunch of senators could be oppossed to Massachusetts > not using an open document format because 'it would impose > unnecessary costs on state government' is beyond me. > > > http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/25/galvin_attacks_software_proposal/ > > Chris > > -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
