Stewart Stremler wrote:
begin quoting Michael O'Keefe as of Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:37:23PM -0800:
[snip]
Now if your CSS is not inline in your HTML (and is a seperate download)
then if you don't have it in the same "relative" path as your HTML as
you would find it on the filesystem (becoz files and directories can be
mapped to different locations in Apache's configuration files) then
you'll have to use a symlink farm so your browser can find them on the
filesystem, just the same.
I was under the impression that CSS in the document was just a
suggestion and that the user could override this suggestion and say "No,
I want to use _that_ CSS over there instead."
Separation of presentation from content is only useful if you can
actually then *change* the presentation component. Otherwise, it's just
using two data files instead of one.
That's right. Most ppl seem to embed their CSS in their HTML, so to
"replace it" you'd have to take all the CSS definitions out and put them
in that other file, then tell your browser "don't use the embedded one,
use that one over there"
It makes it a little easier for you to modify the CSS if it is actually
another file DL'd by the browser, coz then you can wget it yourself and
modify as you see fit, rather than ripping it out of the HTML source
--
Michael O'Keefe | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Live on and Ride a 03 BMW F650GSDakar| [EMAIL PROTECTED] / |
I like less more or less less than |Work:+1 858 845 3514 / |
more. UNIX-live it,love it,fork() it |Fax :+1 858 845 2652 /_p_|
My views are MINE ALONE, blah, blah, |Home:+1 760 788 1296 \`O'|
blah, yackety yack - don't come back |Fax :+1 858 _/_\|_,
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
