> Well, if it is *L*GPL, IBM is not required to return changes. Hmm, the way I understood the LGPL is that any changes to the code would have to be released. However, using or linking to the LGPL'd code in a product would not "infect" your code with any particular license.
I could be wrong; it has been several years since I glossed over the license. -- Rick Funderburg -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
