From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> country (think China) use and modify the software without having to reveal their identify? In the case of *forced* publication of changes, this fails. The LGPL and GPL both pass this test. As long as you do not distribute the resultant binary, you are not forced to disclose any modifications. This is actually A Good Thing. Forced speech is not Free speech.
But if you're running a public website, you are already not anonymous. I don't think this is germane to the issue.
Personally I think using it to run a service on a public website *shoul* equal distribution, but I don't think this is currently the case.
Gabe -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
