On 2/24/06, DJA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RBW wrote:
> > I'm looking at my options for implementing LVM on my laptop which has a
> > @40GB HD. At the time I originally partitioned the drive 3 years ago I
> > had for the first time not made the usual multiple partitions one would
> > make such as found in this article
> ...
> > What I do have is the following:
> >
> > $ fdisk -l
> > Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes
> > 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77520 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> > /dev/hda1   *           1       25372    12787456+  83  Linux
> > /dev/hda2           25373       77520    26282340    5  Extended
> > /dev/hda5           25373       27907     1277136   82  Linux swap /
> > Solaris
> > /dev/hda6           27907       77520    25005141   83  Linux
> >
> > $ df
> > Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/hda1             12386752   7827676   3919704  67% /
> > /dev/shm                355048         0    355048   0% /dev/shm
> > /dev/hda6             24612312  19173028   5439284  78% /home
> >
> > I will have need to stretch into the nearly 4GB that is available on "/"
> > which is why this issue has come up. I can symlink over on "/" to what I
> > need to work on but I also want to investigate how I can get from where
> > I am to LVM.
> >
> > The biggest thing I notice so far from the docs is that I don't
> > necessarily want to have /root inside the LVM structure with a boot
> > loader ( http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/benefitsoflvmsmall.html ).
> > This may be a deal breaker from what I see so far...
> ...
> >
> > So I am looking for any hints or tips that others may have experienced
> > or considered.
> >
> > TIA,
> > RBW
>
> I have a 100 GB drive in my laptop. It's dual-boot with XP Pro getting
> about 30 GB, and Fedora Core 4 getting the rest. I realize this is
> roughly 1.5 times the capacity you have but it's still representative of
> what kind of proportions I'd probably use with only 40 GB for Linux.
>
> Leaving out any real philosophical or emotional reasons motives, her is
> how my Linux partitions are set up (from df):
>
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5              9694844   8114124   1080300  89% /
> /dev/hda2                69995     51842     14539  79% /boot
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LV_home
>                       20314748   2374068  16892104  13% /home
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LV_tmp
>                        4062912     41056   3812144   2% /tmp
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LV_usrlocal
>                       24916624    257476  23373004   2% /usr/local
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LV_var
>                        4062912    539840   3313360  15% /var
>
> The swap partition is ~1 GB (for 512 MB RAM), which is probably too big
> for what I use the laptop.
>
> Also this is a full install of FC4. (i.e. the "Install everything"
> option). Given the above usage after a year's use, it looks like
> /usr/local might someday give up some room for /home, although I'll
> probably wish I'd put / into the LV also.

I guess it's time for my observations about LVM stuff.

/boot can't be in an LV because Grub doesn't understand that.
/ shouldn't be in an LV because if you ever want to resize it, you can
only do that if it is not mounted.  And running with / unmounted takes
some extra tricks.  Namely, booting a distribution disk in rescue
mode.   Last time I fought with this, Knoppix could not read LV's.

The default naive installation of Fedora Core puts all of the disk
into LVM except for a 100MB /boot partition.

    carl
--
    carl lowenstein         marine physical lab     u.c. san diego
                                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to