James G. Sack (jim) wrote: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> .. >> The docs say that the sequence number is part of the prompt >> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/otpw.html >> > > Looking at that again, I find that: > > The download site shows the latest version is 1.3 from Oct, 2003 > There is a snapshot from Mar, 2004, but .. > > ..has there been no development on this for that long? > > It doesn't compile correctly on x86_64. > > The 1.3 has a makefile but no auto-STUFF configuration components. Maybe > it needs a packaging expert? > > > I see that PLD has an rpm, maybe I'll look at that. >
OK, I discover that the make errors can be cleared by using -fPIC on 5 of the compiles (otpw.o, md.o, rmd160.o, otpw-l.o, pam_otpw.o) The snapshot seems to be marked 1.4, the PLD rpm uses 1.3, and passes -fPIC to all the compilations -- I guess it does no harm to the other 2 objects (otpw-gen.o, demologin.o) The author's Makefile has an install-pam target whereas the PLD rpm distributes more things (eg, via /usr/bin/install). I haven't figured the rpm spec details out yet (the PLD src rpm doesn't build without their macros). Guess I'll download the i386.rpm and see what rpm -qlp says) ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
