The biggest difference with mainframes is their
ability to run multiple virtual systems (hence MVS).
This allows a process to be run simultaneously. IBM's
p-series (rs/6000) currently has this functionality.
IBM's parallel sysplex technlogy allows a transaction
to be run concurrently. This means that a transaction
is fault tolerant no matter what stage the processing
is in.

--- Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wade Curry wrote:
> > paragraphs :-) .  The breach between the mainframe
> and *nix camps
> > is more cultural than anything else, IMHO.  We
> tout our clusters and
> > distributed setups, and then install a blade
> server to get them all
> > in the same rack.  They tout the blessings of
> consolidated
> > hardware, higher throughput and ability to get
> everything out of a
> > CP (they are designed to run at 100% capacity),
> and then install
> > dozens of virtual machines... 
> 
> I would definitely like to learn more about
> mainframes and apply the 
> good ideas from the mainframe world to the Unix
> world. I understand that 
> mainframe hardware is of the highest quality and
> fault tolerant with 
> lots of emphasis put on IO and I hope we can carry
> more of that over 
> into the Unix/PC world. I am still trying to
> understand what advantages 
> the mainframe software world has. My biggest
> complaint (which I recently 
> voiced on slashdot) is that we have no way of
> learning about mainframes. 
> The average person can't afford one. The average
> (small) company can't 
> even afford one! And Wade is only the second person
> I have ever met in 
> my life who had any real experience with mainframes.
> I think mainframes 
> would be a lot more widespread if IBM had given the
> software away for 
> free and some minimal hardware platform on which to
> run it so that more 
> people could have access to understand the
> technology. I know I will 
> never recommend a mainframe solution to my employer
> until I really have 
> some practical experience with one. And given the
> amount of OLTP and 
> OLAP that we do around here we could probably use
> some of those 
> capabilities of a mainframe.
> 
> > The *nix camp though, seems to be absorbing less
> of the better
> > technology from mainframes... and doing it more
> slowly.  Xen seems
> > to be a good example.  On the other hand, there's
> not a whole lot
> > else.  We don't have nearly as robust facilities
> for scheduling
> > batch jobs, allocating resources to specific tasks
> on the fly,
> > detailed transaction logging, etc.
> 
> What do you mean by "scheduling batch jobs"? I
> understand that "batch 
> jobs" are a major part of the workload for
> mainframes but I have no idea 
> what they really are. Would a batch job just be the
> generation of a 
> report or something? If so we schedule batch jobs
> out of cron and it 
> works just fine. Maybe the mainframes have a better
> way of doing it but 
> the way we are doing it is "good enough". I would
> like to be able to 
> allocate resources to specific tasks on the fly but
> I think we are 
> getting there with clustering and Xen. Detailed
> transaction logging is a 
> part of our application. Is it part of the OS in the
> mainframe world? If 
> so, why should the OS need to be aware of Alice
> buying a toothbrush?
> 
> > The blog link mentioned below is a fairly good one
> for mainframers.
> 
> I will definitely be checking it out.
> 
> > In case you need a reminder, IFLs are specialized
> CPUs that
> > are optimized for Linux.
> 
> If you run Linux on a mainframe don't you lose the
> batch processing and 
> other niceties that the mainframe OS provides you?
> Then what you have is 
> a very reliable Linux box on very expensive
> hardware. Still better than 
> running it on a PC, I'm sure.
> 
> > Oh.. and let me know if you think these posts are
> too off-topic.  I
> > don't intend to make a habit of it, just when I
> see a more
> > prominent announcement.  FWIW, the press release
> that Timothy
> 
> I think these posts are very much on topic and I
> hope you will send us 
> more stuff like this.
> 
> -- 
> Tracy R Reed
> http://copilotconsulting.com
> 1-877-MY-COPILOT
> 
> 
> -- 
> [email protected]
>
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
> 


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to