[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Surely there will be differences in the widget set (and appearances). > > Why should there be differences in appearances if wx uses GTK? >
Pardon me, I think I misread your question. But on further look-around, I see the statement <quote url="http://www.wxwindows.org/manuals/2.6.3/wx_wxgtkport.html#wxgtkport";> wxGTK is a port of wxWidgets using the GTK+ library. It makes use of GTK+'s native widgets wherever possible and uses wxWidgets' generic controls when needed. </endquote> Do you read that to say that some controls will look different from native GTK? On their FAQ page, http://wxwidgets.org/docs/faqgen.htm#specific they disavow the "'lowest common denominator' approach", and they also say things like "..functionality missing on some platform has been provided using generic, platform-independent code, such as the wxTreeCtrl and wxListCtrl classes." They _do_ say that they do not support Gnome features. And I also notice there is precious little that I could find on their site about actual widgits available. ... Ahh, wait: after hunting around, I did find http://www.wxwidgets.org/wiki/index.php/WidgetGallery and it looks like the default appearance for some things is different from what is seen in glade-2, but maybe their screenshot is just old? ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
