Tracy R Reed wrote: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> I agree that css has matured to a point where it is capable of >> _pretty-good-presentation_, and has the advantage that it's a fairly >> simple concept that can easily be mastered by (say) web page designers. > > Right, this is the key point for me. We don't need transformations and > we need to stick with what we know so XSLT is out. > > So back to my original question: Anyone know of a way to convert > XHTML/CSS to PDF or PS?
Well, just-for-kicks, I tried prince, and I note it has problems with background images, and of course, it _probably_ deserves to have some media=print stylesheet overrides, including attention to print width and fonts. Basic operation is pretty smooth, though (if you have good x/html). ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
