On 8/10/06, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Andrew Lentvorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigh. And your statement is historically ignorant.
My point was that there was a GPL before there was anything called
"open source" and before there was an Open Source Initiative. If
we're talking about the proliferation of open source licenses, then I
think that the GPL certainly does not qualify as being "at fault" for
that.
There was "open source" in the 1960's and 1970's. Nobody called it
that. Just the way things were done betwen cooperating computer
users.
See SHARE (IBM), DECUS (DEC), I forget the name (Control Data).
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
