kelsey hudson wrote:
gossamer axe wrote:
yeah, so just like the number of GPRs in the x86 architecture, it's CPU interrupt architecture sucks just as bad, being that there were really only 3-4 spare IRQs for hardware that wasn't already in the box. How this architecture caught on I'll never know.

Three letters ...

I ... B ... M

Nobody bought an "Intel".  They bought an "IBM".

And, in fact, they didn't even really buy an "IBM".

They bought "that thing that runs Lotus and WordPerfect".

x86 was simply along for the ride.

And, to be fair, the x86 isn't that bad an architecture when you have to draw the schematics by hand and cut rubylith with an xacto knife.

We judge the x86 architecture by what we know now; not by what they knew then.

-a


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to