On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:29:28PM -0700, James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Speech recognition should get somewhat better, but there are limitations
> > when grabbing samples of air vibrations. Humans compensate for this by
> > analyzing the context, which is something that is very hard for
> > computers to do. I assume that one could get much better accuracy by
> > implanting small sensors into the muscles that are involved in speech.
> > I have had a similar thought for a version of sign language using some
> > sort of glove. These ideas may help until a direct-to-brain interface
> > is working.
> >
>
> Don't forget the Universal Translator (tm).
>
> ..j
The Babblefish?
--
Lan Barnes
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist
Tcl/Tk Enthusiast
Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon.
- The Dali Lama
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
