Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > David M. Cook wrote: >> What about GLib? > > Waaaay too much baggage. Just like the Apache Portable Runtime. > > I'm looking for something where each data structure is in a .h and .c > file that you can just grab and go. > > I'd forgotten just how low-level C is. Yuck.
Yeah, every time I go into c-source to figure out how something works, I'm surprised that I'm so shocked -- I think it's a denial phenomenon. Could you get some benefits of not-reinventing things by static linking? Or are you saying that glib suffers from Everything Depends On Everything Else (tm)? Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
