Lan Barnes wrote: >.. > If you convince me otherwise, I'll do a 500 degree shift in my thinking.
Hmmmpf! 500 degree shift, indeed. You meant π radians, no doubt. But you and apl both have good points about factors and scaling conveniences. What do you think about redefining π := √10 ℯ := ∛10 Hmmm, that doesn't help with factoring, does it? But π := √12 ℯ := ∛12 would never work, would they? Oh, well, ..j -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
