Lan Barnes wrote:
On Thu, December 7, 2006 3:36 pm, Todd Walton wrote:
So, who exactly is this Ecma?  And how are they in a position to make
standards independent of ISO?

-todd


On 12/7/06, Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this from my "Big Picture" buddy is worth forwarding. It's
certainly a Linux topic at the strategic level.

---------------------------- Original Message
----------------------------
Subject: standardization
From:    "Jim Ferstle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:    Thu, December 7, 2006 8:19 am
To:      "Lan Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-big snip-

Beats me. In truth, anyone can set up a standards committee (or think tank
or professional organization with certifications) and it's a standard ploy
of sleezy industry players to do just that.

A consortium of sleazy players is exactly what ECMA is. It's members submit only their own technology to the group, where after (read when, not if) being approved, is declared a "Standard". It is then usually submitted to the IOS for mainstream acceptance. Microsoft recently became a major committee member of ECMA. That position coincidently gives it a vote in what and how the rules of technology acceptance is implemented. IOW, a kind of veto power.

I read TFA above, and while it does contain several inaccuracies, it nevertheless describes the ODF vs. OXML battle, albeit with a subtle pro-M$ attitude. A very important fact which should be kept in mind when reading it is that OpenXML is _not_ a standard. It is a description of a proprietary, and patented Microsoft methodology. Unlike a true standard, its complete workings are not available to anyone wishing to implement them.

Someone else recently described M$'s offering of OpenXML to ECMA as "Greeks bearing gifts". Think RAMbus: offer your technology to a insider group "Standards" body, then later attempt to sue into submission anyone who dares to fully and profitably implement the "Standard".

For a good comparison of the two methodologies as submitted to ECMA read this http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061212025314700.

--
   Best Regards,
      ~DJA.


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to