Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ASCII.
Fair enough. > You're pushing a burden on to the reader that righly belongs with > the writer. Using something beyond ASCII may turn out to be a benefit to the reader, depending on the reader's available technology. It's now 2007, and we're not talking about graphics and animation here. The Luddites don't hold an inarguable stance. I'm biased right now: Lately I've been writing software that deals with ingesting text in different character sets. It's not that hard, or even if it is hard it's mostly already been solved. I'll complain along with many others here about the horrors of HTML in email, but I thought we'd have moved beyond problems with character sets by now. > No, you're confusing me with someone else. Sorry, I realized that after sending my message. I hope you can still see my point in the context of the broader discussion. -- Steven E. Harris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
