John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > Stewart Stremler wrote: >> >> You might as wish that the W3C would provide better standards; every >> time I go look at "W3C standards" I start wondering what sort of drugs >> they're smoking (and why they're on such a power-trip). They're not as >> bad as ECMA, but still... > > I dislike how they retroactively change standards. I had most, if not > all, of my public webpages W3C compliant. Then they changed the > requirements, and then my proudly displaying compliant pages weren't. I > was none too pleased. >
I'm curious about your bad experience. Do you recall the circumstances? Was this something about withdrawn standards or proposals? Maybe you're just saying the later standards are more complex? Or seem harder to validate against? Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
