Lan Barnes wrote:
On Wed, March 28, 2007 2:28 am, Ralph Shumaker wrote:
That depends on how the birth control works. I think most birth control
interferes with the ability of the already fertilized egg from bonding
to the uterine wall. This fertilized egg already has the DNA of the
being that it would grow up to be if not manhandled (so to speak) out
into oblivion. God certainly didn't intend this.
And that falls into the category of a belief you want to impose on others
who don't share it.
Not so. Nowhere did I indicate that I wish to impose this very strict
view on anyone. Stop putting words in my mouth. (Why are you so
defensive, Lan?) I merely stated my view on it.
For myself, just as I can tell the difference between an acorn and an oak
tree, I can see the difference between a fertilized zygote and a teenager.
The unhatched egg of an eagle has more protection than the unborn
human. How pathetic.
How convenient that you don't even recognize it as a person. I'm
reminded of a movie (maybe "The Cell") in which the sicko says to his
victim something like "It puts it in the bucket." instead of "You put it
in the bucket." (or perhaps it was "Silence of the Lambs"). Apparently,
it's easier to commit atrocities to something not seen as a human.
I'm Pro-Choice. But I say let the child choose. Interestingly enough,
I've never known of anyone who asks to be aborted.
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
