begin quoting Christian Seberino as of Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:14:08PM -0700: > > On Wed, April 11, 2007 5:16 pm, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Christian Seberino wrote: > > > >> That leaves Flash. I HAVE NO IDEA why Microsoft includes Flash in IE > >> without trying any funny business to break compatibility. > > > > They don't. I have to download the plugin for it to work. > > The Flash plugin installation is easy and semi-automatic > for Flash when you need it.
On the Mac (where Safari has Flash support out of the box, alas) I *still* get a ton of "you must upgrade" notices. > Is it as painless to install JVM in IE when you need it? If yes then I'm Reportedly so. Simpler than Java into Mozilla, I'm told. > not sure why Java didn't take over the client side since it has such a > head start. It's from Sun, so Microsofties hated it and RMSofties hated it. And the sandbox was too effective for many webheads. "What do you mean I can't do _that_?" -- General purpose languages probably aren't appropriate for a browser. Stewart Stremler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
