James E. Henderson wrote:
Ralph Shumaker wrote:

I consider "tho" to be an improvement over "though". But I also see it as something in common enough use to be not too awfully far from adoption. I think I might even intermix the two just to show that it's *not* ignorance compelling me to do it, *nor* laziness, but rather a deliberate choice.
Ah, but remember that "though" was likely pronounced as it is written, the pronunciation having changed since Chaucer's time while the spelling has remained the same. Likewise, "two" was likely pronounced as "duo" or "dvo", the 'k' in "knight" wasn't silent, and so on. Written language is far more conservative than spoken language. If the written forms changed as rapidly as their spoken counterparts, we wouldn't be able to read documents older than a couple of centuries.

Words like debt (among others) never had the "b" sound. Island didn't used to have the "s" in it at all but was added as a convention to associate it with the word "isla", the two of which were otherwise not connected. (See link below.)


The spelling only looks funny because we don't use the funny pronunciation of earlier times.

Be that as it may. There is little chance of the spoken language migrating back to match the written forms. Ever increasing is the gap between the two. Currently there is greater disparity between them than in Noah Webster's time. And even he was arguing for spelling reform. And the longer we go without spelling reform, the bigger the gap will be between what we speak and what we write. The inevitable result will be akin to a region that needs minor earthquakes and doesn't get them. When they finally do come, the changes will approach the catastrophic. But unlike the absence of earthquakes, we feel the strain as the gap continues to increase. Ever increasing are the exceptions to the rules.

http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/DKitchen/new_655/webster_language.htm


--
It will be readily admitted that the pleasures of reading and conversing, the advantage of accuracy in business, the necessity of clearness and precision in communicating ideas, require us to be able to speak and write our own tongue with ease and correctness.
--Noah Webster, 1789


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to