Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > > Huh? Emacs works for me just fine. That's the whole point of using XML > in this instance. Emacs handles the tagging and editing without needing > some bizarre custom editor. > > Doesn't vi handle xml?
Of course it does. XML is a ``plain text'' file format (for varying definitions of "plain text." Personally, if it is not ASCII, it is not plain text.) Vi also allows you to edit any part of the file to include anything you wish, or modify any portion. Emacs certainly does that, no? So Emacs can break an XML file just as well as vi can, can't it? Or are you asking about integrated parsers and verifiers? They already make those, no need to try to recreate that in an editor. -john -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
