Bob La Quey wrote:
Again the innovative parts of NetKernel have nothing to do with
TCP/IP or NAT. They are operating well below that level of the
system.
That's not what NetKernel claims:
http://www.1060research.com/netkernel/features/index.html
The diagram shows NetKernel sitting *above* the Java VM and OS, not
below. Quoting:
"NetKernel is built on a precision-crafted micro-kernel. It resolves
logical URIs to physical service implementations. A Unix-like process
table holds pending requests for scheduling onto threads held in a
tightly managed thread pool. The micro-kernel enables both synchronous
and asynchronous processing and its sophisticated algorithms optimizes
CPU throughput while minimizing thread contention and context switching
costs. Developing applications at a logical level means it is impossible
to write non-threadsafe systems."
Now maybe their marketing just sucks, but, given the slickness of their
website, that is not an immediate assumption I would make. Especially
since they have their own license.
I stand by my NAT hole punching test. If you can't use the framework to
do that, it doesn't have enough flexibility.
-a
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
