Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >.. > You can take a fundamentally broken design and throw it completely away > *as long as you have a full set of unit tests*. Unit tests are possibly > more valuable than the actual code base.
In practice, I suppose you _never_ have a /complete/ set of unit tests. Nevertheless, I am attracted to the idea of only claim (eg in specs) that which you have a [unit] test for I wonder if any significant project has ever come close to achieving this? >.. Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
