begin quoting David Brown as of Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:00:35AM -0800: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:04:27PM -0800, SJS wrote: > > >Well, if they prepared the food, they'd be a cafeteria. And I've > >paid the flat-rate for minimally-metered access to a cafeteria. > >It worked pretty well. If the cafeteria at work offered a flat-rate > >plan, I might well take advantage of it. > > A certain famous search engine company is kind of known for having a > free-to-employees cafeteria that serves fairly good food. I know that if I > worked at a place like that it would be very hard to not become quite > large.
Well, yes, there's that. :) I've worked on projects where they keep a "Candy Table". Great idea, except for the long-term health ramifications. When you're flagging, a handful of hot tamales is very appealing, although BLQ's notion of taking a nap instead is a much better idea. > My work has working dinners but it would be hard to consider it good food. > They also are fairly restrictive of portions, so it doesn't really work > like a cafeteria. Also, technically it counts as income from the IRS's > perspective. For some reason, working lunches don't. Presumably, you don't drink at lunch but you do at dinner, perhaps? -- Why yesh, Ish been drinkin' offisher, howsh come? Swhat? Oooh, watersh, moshly, flavoreded wish rum! Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
