On Jan 26, 2008 2:00 AM, MattyJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it have to be open source/free?
It has to be free, and I would really really love for it to be open source. It's a sort of pilot project and I don't have any money. > We went through an evaluation for a wiki at my work. We ended up putting > Mediawiki and Confluence (commercial product from Atlassian) up against > each other and for our purposes we were much more impressed with > Confluence. It seemed to be more 'business' oriented for collaboration, if > I can get away with being that vague. Wow, that is slick. Confluence, feature-wise anyway, is exactly what I would like to have. I have to imagine that one could build Mediawiki to do all of that, but it wouldn't be near as smooth. -todd -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
