On Thu, March 13, 2008 1:27 pm, Michael O'Keefe wrote: >> As I look at the web pages, I suspect the relative isolation of >> webcalendar might appeal to me more. However, having an address book is >> also nice. > > Yes, me too. > I just want a calendar, I don't want Exchange re-written > >
This leaves me with the challenge of writing a c/s address book for my family. The Wolfe Doctrine (why the hell write it when someone else already has?) has exceptions, as in, it'll be fun/a learning experience. Requirements: - postgres - tcl/tk - simple enough so it doesn't become a career - complex enough so it's useful - multiuser (individual and group "ownership" of addresses) - able to do address labels from lists - able to print 5.5" X 8.5" Franklin-Covey "Classic" alphabetized pages My problem is, as I start to analyze the address schema, I see complication piled on complexity. Multiple numbers, metafiles of number types, splitting records (divorces etc) .... Better to just do a damned flat file with a fixed number of bins. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
