begin quoting Brad Beyenhof as of Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:18:58AM -0700: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:48 PM, SJS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > begin quoting Todd Walton as of Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:44:47PM -0500: > > > > I think all websites should have colophons. > > > > > > Doesn't favicon.ico fulfill this? > > > > Uh... no... Would you think it would? > > I think we're getting mixed up with definitions here. A colophon > originally meant a publisher's emblem or symbol, which favicon.ico > does arguably fill. However, I think Todd is referring to the other > definition, which refers to something like a newspaper's masthead... a > list of all contributors, editors, designers, and whatnot that were > involved in production.
Lacking context, and faced with multiple definitions, I picked one. It was a reasonable interpretation. -- I don't believe in telepathy, and further, I object to its practice. Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
