Lan Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, March 22, 2008 1:11 pm, SJS wrote:
>> begin  quoting Lan Barnes as of Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:56:18PM -0700:
>>> Why why WHY do programmers send informational messages to stderr? It
>>> makes
>>> it really difficult to script calls to the program that check for
>>> errors.
>>> What is it about the "err" in stderr that they don't understand?
>> Sometimes what's desired is unbuffered output, so stdout won't do.
>>
>> Sometimes a tool is being used that colors stdout differently than
>> stderr; so an easy way to make some messages stand out is to print 'em
>> to stderr.
>>
>> Sometimes the programmer wants to see informational/status messages
>> without bothered with all the output, so the stuff the programmer is
>> currently interested in goes to stderr, and everything else goes to
>> stdout, and thus a nice little filter is possible merely by using
>> "programname > /dev/null".
>>
>> Perhaps your programmers aren't returning an error code when there's
>> an error (a better way to check for errors)?
>>
>> For JUnit tests (Java), I've implemented a little
>> capture-stdout-and-stderr
>> tool, so that I can verify output conditions in the unit tests... any
>> test that emits output to stderr during a successful test gets its test
>> wrapped in my little widget, and the test gets updated to assert that
>> indeed, nothing was written to stderr.
>>
>> Of course, that test fails, but now it can be *checked* that there's no
>> stderr output if there's no error.
>>
>> I really think this sort of thing should be in the junit framework, but
>> what's a clean way of doing so?
>>
> 
> Absolutely nothing you've said makes me think they're doing the right, or
> even the sane thing.
> 
> Among other things, it means that anyone using their programs as building
> blocks now has to parse the stderr output to determine if an error,
> indeed, has occured.
> 

Suggest you consider restating your complaint as:

"Programs that make it hard to determine execution success or failure
status suck"

There's also the chance that you didn't see an easy way, already there.

SJS gave good examples; just because they didn't occur to you or don't
make sense to you is not reason to reject them.

Regards,
..jim (well, maybe he's just having a bad day?)


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to