** Reply to message from Joshua Penix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 7 May 2008 10:35:21 -0700
> 1) Focus on technology -- > 2) Focus on community and "crowdsourcing" -- #2 never entered my mind and to me, what "Web 2.0" means is closer to #1 I had thought that Web 1.0 was considered the static browser page feed by various backend server systems( static pages, CGI, ASP, JSP, etc ). So Web 2.0 was what results when you build sites where the browser has dynamic capabilities to do some stuff on its own( AJAX for example ). But I can see how some might feel that Web 1.0 was the feeding of pages by the few server owners and Web 2.0 is the dynamic content where users are the ones adding most of the content. It always blew me away that more people didn't have their own web pages for what blogging does now. I used to do it and know of many people who also did it but our society is such that people are too unwilling to learn basic skills and its got to be mouse click or two or it's too hard for them. I still see #2 as more of an implementation thing which is made more interesting when #1 is available and used. Doug -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
