On Sat, 24 May 2008, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
Paul G. Allen wrote:
Adding addresses to the black list permanently blocks such addresses.

Stop right there. You have an implicit assumption of "user with clue". Those of us who run business email systems have no such user.

hehehe thats funny a user with a clue! thankfully i was not drinking my starbucks when i saw that :D

I dont assume anyone has a clue but telling all these clueless users to "drop all your spam into the spam folder, and everynight it gets specially deleted and it reduces your spam" then a nightly cron job that
        1. makes a list of all the from addresses
        2. removes any whitelist addresses from the list
        3. blacklists any address in both the grey list and this list
        4. grey lists this list
        5. removes greylisted addresses after 180 days
        6. deletes all email in this special spam folder
works well. BTW #2 works well to help reduce stupidity remember any address that gets this treatment passed all other tests

why do they need to know the mechanics of it? this is an argument that gets made all over, "you will be a better driver if you know how the car works" when in fact you only need to know how some parts of the car work to be a great driver.


2) This is a variant of the "backscatter spam" problem. The problem occurs when you get forged return addresses. Since you can't count on the return address, these systems can be used to DDoS an intermediate party. This is the same reason why sanely configured mail systems no longer send "Unable to deliver" messages in return.

ASK is the last thing the e-mail sees. All other methods used in my previous e-mail are implemented first. All the other methods will effectively eliminate 90% of the spam that your system sees, significantly reducing backscatter.

It doesn't matter. A forged return address can pass all of your checks. Remember, the spammers aren't just creating their own email systems. They also hijack systems and then send through real, normal, properly configured email systems.

nothing is going to work 100% and at this point in the internet I see no way of fixing it ever, no one wants a body saying who can send email and who cant, because any mechanics of that will be used wrongly.

all any system can do is reduce the amount of spam that gets by. this method works well, along with other methods.


Never had an ASK challenge or response tagged as spam.

Every single challenge email I have ever seen now gets marked as SPAM. This caused me a *huge* nightmare with three different companies that I was caught in between.
then your system is broken. but your not saying "i cant fix my system" your saying "this type of system cant work" those are different


Richard Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to