On Sun, July 20, 2008 12:13 am, Tracy R Reed wrote: > David Brown wrote: >> More than 0, less than 1. But how is that relevant? I've been in >> active > > Because it's pretty annoying and arrogant to call it stupidly designed. > It works great for lots of purposes and lots of very talented people > have put years of work into it. >
No, Tracy, they really did screw the pooch. You can spend years making mud pies, but they're still mud pies[0]. The fundamental architecture is IMO deeply flawed. - no tags - no branching - no change sets All snapshots all day. [0] This BTW is one of Karl Marx's major fallacies ... that he equated effort with value. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
