I've been getting a lot of these, all Kooler, all on the "Obama wants to abort our daughters" thread. I figure it's just one person's ISP catching something (in the Subject?) and barfing.
How good is my guess? ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Undeliverable: [X-Spam]Re: One reason some may not want to vote for Obama.... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, September 6, 2008 2:34 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The recipient's mailbox is full and can't accept messages now. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please try resending this message later, or contact the recipient directly. ________________________________ Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: emome.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] #550 5.2.2 STOREDRV.Deliver: mailbox full. The following information should help identify the cause: "MapiExceptionShutoffQuotaExceeded:16.18969:B2000000, 17.27161:0000000094000000000000000000000000000000, 255.23226:00000000, 255.27962:FE000000, 255.17082:DD040000, 0.26937:0E000000, 4.21921:DD040000, 255.27962:FA000000, 255.1494:86000000, 255.26426:FE000000, 4.7588:0F010480, 4.6564:0F010480, 4.4740:05000780, 4.6276:05000780, 4.5721:DD040000, 4.6489:DD040000, 4.2199:DD040000, 4.17097:DD040000, 4.8620:DD040000, 255.1750:71040000, 0.26849:0F010480, 255.21817:DD040000, 0.26297:34000000, 4.16585:DD040000, 0.32441:00000000, 4.1706:DD040000, 0.24761:0F010480, 4.20665:DD040000, 0.25785:2F000000, 4.29881:DD040000". ## Original message headers: Received: from MASQL01 (10.1.108.178) by EXHUB01.emome.net (10.1.108.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:34:29 +0800 X-hMailServer-ExternalAccount: wintwk Received: from msx-sms8-2.hinet.net (msx-sms8-2.hinet.net [168.95.7.82]) by ms59.hinet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA07299 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:30:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from msx-sg6-11.hinet.net (msx-sg6-11.hinet.net [168.95.5.116]) by msx-sms8-2.hinet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m86LUEho008922 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:30:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (64-52-164-214.client.cypresscom.net [64.52.164.214]) by msx-sg6-11.hinet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA14360 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 05:30:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B63097DD9; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.linuxgeek.net (mail.linuxgeek.net [68.15.17.93]) by sparkplug.kernel-panic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC9B97D9F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxgeek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC47400AB46 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxgeek.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.linuxgeek.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17111-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.linuxgeek.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxgeek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A82F400AB44 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 68.101.177.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lan) by webmail.linuxgeek.net with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:30:04 -0700 From: Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kooler Discussion - for offtopic threads <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at linuxgeek.net Subject: [X-Spam]Re: One reason some may not want to vote for Obama.... X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kooler Discussion - for offtopic threads <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: Kooler Discussion - for offtopic threads <kplug-kooler.kernel-panic.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-kooler>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-kooler> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-kooler>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAc= X-HiNet-Brightmail: Spam Content-Length: 772 Status: RO Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received-SPF: SoftFail (exhub01.emome.net: domain of transitioning [EMAIL PROTECTED] discourages use of 10.1.108.178 as permitted sender) -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer
--- Begin Message ---On Sat, September 6, 2008 1:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:13:12PM -0700, Joshua Penix wrote: >> You realize the "slippery slope" argument is a logical fallacy, yes? >> I'd recommend avoiding it in arguments or position statements. > > I'm not a good debator. I'm not good at making arguments. Hence, I don't > know > why the "slippery slope" argument is a logical fallacy. > That's OK, I didn't either. I always had some discomfort with it because it assumes people can't draw lines for themselves (OK to have 2 beers, not OK to get blotto). -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-kooler
--- End Message ---
-- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
