On Tuesday 25 October 2005 03:43 am, Tom Gal wrote: > > Looks good to me. It is an alternative to XML > > for data exchange. > > > > http://www.crockford.com/JSON/xml.html > > > > Comments? > > > > BobLQ > > > > -- > > [email protected] > > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg > > I think it at least makes sense to try to come up with something that > is a proper subset of XML so any XML parser could interpret it. Check > out burlap for example: > > http://www.caucho.com/burlap/ > > it's a lightweight version of XML for RPC. I think methods like that > have promise because they are indeed a subset of XML, which while it > has problems is really aimed at flexibility. > > -Tom
Hi Tom, In view of my earlier opinions I have to like Burlap :) See http://www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/11/sml/index.html And I thought SML was dead and gone. BobLQ -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
