Tracy R Reed wrote:
Well, there is a fair bit of code out there that assumes sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*) as well, so you are kind of damned if you do and damned if you don't, but yeah, that is part of it.Christopher Smith wrote:For an idea as to one of the reasons why, you might look at why even on 64-bit Solaris, sizeof(int) == 4.Because so much code assumes sizeof(int) == 4 ? :)
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
