On Mon, April 2, 2007 9:36 am, Christopher Smith wrote: > Lan Barnes wrote: >> While you guys have been using this thread to rhaposidize about that >> which >> is new, shiny, hip slick and cool, I've been shaking my head and >> wondering >> if you really missed my original point that completely: that maybe 98% >> of >> the time, simple and direct is better than hip, slick and cool. > > -big snip- > > Believe me, I wasn't sneering. From my perspective, a scripting language > is there to help you get things done quickly, and often the price for > that is a small bit of runtime overhead. In that context, threads in a > scripting language seems counter productive. > > --Chris
Well ... OK! </me draws the hem of my garment 'round me and tries to recover the threads of my dignity> -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
