Wade Curry wrote:
Stewart Stremler([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:28:34AM -0700 wrote:
begin quoting Christopher Smith as of Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 12:00:46AM -0700:
but frankly Java without generics just had this huge
gaping eyesore of a problem in its type system,
It still does. Java has to reduce everything to "Object" before it can
do generic things with it. That causes some very strange idiocies.
The sheer verbosity of the code is what assaults my eyes. I can
appreciate the OO method for a variety of reasons. Verbosity tends
to follow along with OO languages, though.
I'm not convinced by your argument. In my experience, verbosity is
caused more by static definitions and typing than by "object oriented".
-a
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
