Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > However, even Erlang still doesn't really have a notion of time. If > you need synchronous behavior (A must occur before B which must occur > before C), it's a real pain in Erlang. > > Now, to be fair, getting it *correct* in other languages is a real > pain, too. Erlang just makes explicit the grief you have to go through. > > However, this kind of grief is what I expect a compiler/language to > take care of for me. Honestly, I think Monads are the clearest way of representing this, and that says something.
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
