Christopher Smith wrote:
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
Honestly, I think Monads are the clearest way of representing this, and
that says something.
I don't agree.
All monads do is declare, "Too hard for the compiler to deal with.
Make the programmer deal with it."
I don't *want* to deal with concurrency any more than I have to.
That's what languages are for.
Not at all. The compiler/runtime gets to deal with the complexity. All
the monad's do is enumerate the points where order matters.
Uh, yeah, what I said.
"The compiler can't figure out when the order matters. Make the
programmer figure that out."
Uh, no.
Computers are better at figuring out tedious crap than I am.
-a
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
