On Jan 1, 2008 11:24 PM, David Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:48:11PM -0800, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>
> >I'm interested to hear your impressions, comments and questions.
>
> First impression question.  Did you have any parsing problems not using the
> trailing ':' that python likes to use before indent blocks?

No problems. Although it becomes required if you want to put a
statement on the same line:

    branch state
        on State.On: print 'on'
        on State.Off: print 'off'

> I definitely like the idea.  I looked at Boo a little bit, and it looks
> like you got some inspiration from that.

A little bit, but the static+dynamic support which people often
attribute to Boo actually comes from my old Objective-C days.

> I'm mostly glad that you seem to understand the value/importance of
> generics.  A semi-statically typed language with a python-like syntax with
> nice generics could be a very useful language.

Thanks and agreed.

> I'll definitely be looking into it when I get a chance.
>
> Just curious if you plan on distributing source.

Definitely. MIT license.

There is some "old style" Cobra code in the compiler which would give
a false impression of current coding style and features. Also, there
are just a few more warts that I wish to remove. It doesn't have to be
perfect, though. Hopefully this month, but certainly no later than
Feb.

-Chuck

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to