On Jan 17, 2008 11:55 AM, Mark Schoonover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 11:50 AM, Brad Beyenhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 17, 2008 10:32 AM, Mark Schoonover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I for one had to go through the Don't Panic Guide, skipping the parts
> > that
> > > talked about using the MIT lab. I'm not an Emacs user, so I needed an
> > intro
> > > to Edwin to get going. Now if I can only stop banging on the ESC key, I
> > > would do much better!
> >
> > Ick... will we *have* to use edwin/emacs? I'd much rather use the
> > interactive mit-scheme console, with vim for text editing when
> > necessary. However, I'm unsure how to load externally-created text
> > files or run their commands from within the console...
>
> We don't have to use anything, you are free to use what you'd like. Just
> keep in mind you may get different answers than others due to differences in
> Scheme versions.
>
> I'm thinking along the same lines as you are, use Vim like I'm used to, and
> some other Lisp interpreter instead of Edwin. I've also played with lispbox,
> but some of the examples is SICP won't work and I don't know enough about
> Lisp yet to figure things out...

I'm using scheme by logging in to my virtual server elsewhere, so I'm
trying to stay at the command-line (though I can X11-forward if
necessary). Just running mit-scheme from the command-line is a great
interactive interpreter, and it seems to be able to load source code
with the --load switch, though all that seems to do is to import
defined functions into the interactive environment.

Anyway, even though the Don't Panic guide is Edwin-centric, what I've
read of the textbook seems to be pretty implementation-agnostic.

-- 
Brad Beyenhof
http://augmentedfourth.com
Silence will save me from being wrong (and foolish), but it will also
deprive me of the possibility of being right.
                                                    ~ Igor Stravinsky

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to