On Jan 25, 2008 9:17 PM, Mark Schoonover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/26/08, Brad Beyenhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008 8:42 PM, Mark Schoonover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Well, I don't know if I won since it took me almost the entire week of > > > thinking about it before I had that aha moment! > > > > Speaking of "taking all week," how should the schedule be going? If > > we're sticking to one lecture per week, MIT-OCW says we should be > > having L3 next Monday, with the 1.1 exercises, Problem Set 1, and > > Project 0 all due then (not to mention reading 1.2 in the text). > > > > I haven't even read the L2 notes yet, though I should be able to get > > through them tomorrow. As for Problem Set 1, I don't even know where > > to find that. How is everybody doing with all this? > > Well, I wasn't really trying to stick to the exact calendar, just what do we > need to do. I'm planning on moving on to the next section tomorrow.
The main reason I mentioned it is that the whole iteration/recursion discussion here looks like it was triggered by Section 1.2 of the SICP text. Should we be trying to stay together? As I mentioned above, I'm just getting started on L2 and I've not even begun reading 1.2. -- Brad Beyenhof http://augmentedfourth.com The history of popular music is littered with great partnerships. Rodgers had his Hammerstein, Lennon had his McCartney, and Lloyd Webber had... his photocopier... ~Humphrey Lyttleton -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
