On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:21:24AM -0800, Christopher Smith wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Call me crazy but wouldn't the empty list, (), make a more elegant > > FALSE object for Scheme than "#f"? > > > Lists have the problem that they disappear under a number of common > transformations. They are, intrinsically *holders* of values, and you > really want FALSE to be a value in its own right. Bottom line: it turns > out the code is more elegant if you don't do it your way.
mit-scheme returns () for FALSE rather than #f. It appears mit-scheme isn't drinking the #f kool-aid. Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
