On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:07:37PM +0200, guy keren wrote: > >#define PI 3.14159
> >Likewise in Scheme.... (define pi 3.14159) > but this PI of yours is not a C-language symbol - it is munched by the > pre-processor, and the compiler just sees the number. > > no idea how this is handled in scheme. I agree. So I'm wondering what the proper CS-speak term for PI above is. Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
