Scheme lists map so nicely to Python lists. Everything is working so elegantly and clear.
I'm loathe to replace the beautifully simple (1 4 5) with (1 . (4 . (5 . ()))) . It is just going to add to the complexity of my Scheme implementation and not seem to give anything back. Plus, I'm still trying to understand stuff like (4 5 8 . 2). Anyone got a good thing to say about conses? :) Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
