Darren New wrote:

In addition, most of what the Smalltalk guys rave about is not the fact that it is object-oriented. What they generally rave about is the fact that the system is introspective without limit.

Yes, but it's introspective *because* everything is an object. *Everything* is an object. Want to walk the call stack? Go for it - it's a linked list of objects. What to store the context of every time you call this function into a collection for later? Want to also include the executable code of the function that called you? Go for it. Etc.

You are confusing the fact that the language is specified with the fact that the runtime is also specified.

You can have a runtime in which everything is an "object" and still not be able to introspect. You can have lots of introspection ina runtime without everything being an "object".

The fact that the runtime is introspective is what you are extolling, not the fact that it has objects.

-a

--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to