James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Now, perhaps this would be a good time to gripe about 'const'?
That probably gives more headaches than signed/unsigned warnings, no?
Wha? const is painless and avoids any number of a host of bugs that I
usually run in to in a non-const world. Indeed, one of the more painful
bits I find about Java is that "final" just can't accomplish the same
thing as const in most cases, which is particularly troublesome because
of Java's pass-by-reference nature. I often end up creating immutable
interfaces as a kludge.
--Chris
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
